Wednesday, January 26, 2005

Captitalism and Call Centers
Hamsters and Humans

It must have been 20 years ago when I wrote a poem about a strikingly handsome black lady I'd seen working in a toad-ugly office. The whole moment of creativity was set off by her gorgeous ebony hands and noble posture that my young mind imagined ancesterally.

In Africa she may have once been an Aida...



...or then again she may once have carried water or molded clay and dug roots, or weaved baskets and fried-up locusts--it really didn't matter. Because what I saw her now doing--week after week--under florescent lights and over an outgassing carpet was a denigration of her person.

There wasn't a cent of nobility in it--she simply needed the money on the one hand, and hated going to the office on the other.

This was progress?

Hadn't this gorgeous, venerable creature been reduced before my eyes? Where once she had made things now she typed shit for shitty bosses in a shitty office. Today's work meant less than nothing; her ancesterally work meant everything.

Oh don't get me wrong. I don't pretend to want to go back to the "good old days."

But just as important-- Nor do I align with today's climate that mocks the "good old days" as really just "bad old days" in disguise.

In fact--the mistake now seems to be in the other direction: we are quick to giggle and snigger and wink that there really wasn't any good in the "good old days."

That's a sin of gluttony. And like all sins, it shames us.

We wax nostalgic because we have in fact lost something.

Indeed we are most fully realized when our work is most intensely linked with our survival. There is a joy in making things that not only help us survive--but things that also, because of their essential goodness, survive when we are gone.

It's called the art of livingry.

We desire fair and honest and essential work.
Not shitty stuff to type in shitty offices for shitty bosses.
Who ever gave a shit about that?

If capitalism's treadmill of creative destruction does not enrich our lives with vital employment... then no matter how much it enriches us with gadgets, entertainment, and abundant foods--IT FAILS US.

Arguably, capitalism is now failing us.

Ironically not because capitalism doesn't work, but because it works so well. The creation and the distribution of goods has never been so efficient--so wonderfully and univerally and robotically dispersed.

But look at the jobs capitalism is creating...



No amount of slick marketing ("contact center professionals") can change the fact that these jobs are worse than typing shitty forms for shitty bosses while inhaling shitty carpet fumes.

The NY TIMES recently had an article about call centers that the great security guru Bruce Schneier sneered at for all the right reasons.

Originally my post was aimed to piggyback his comments. Namely--that we worry too much about our Big Government Brother and not enough about our Big Corporate Uncle.

But then I read the Times article and saw these hamsters:



"Monitors listen in on calls at Aon Consulting, one of the nation's biggest third-party call center monitors, in Melville, N.Y. Nationwide, about 2 percent of the millions of calls made to call centers are monitored."

And then read this:

"Tapping into calls from his cubicle in Melville, N.Y., Stuart Pike is one of an army of listeners employed by these companies. He has an unrestricted view of how corporate America deals with the public - and how the public talks back.
The business of assessing the behavior of operators has taken on a new urgency in recent years ...
That reality has turned third-party call monitoring into a fast-growing industry watching over the nation's six million call center operators as well as hundreds of thousands offshore. And people like Mr. Pike, who listens to about 150 calls a week, have become the equivalent of factory foremen policing America's service economy."


This is progess?

We all have to survive.

But in a world of increasing plenty... how can a culture ask people--with a straight face--to spend their one working life on this planet this way?

For shame.

Friday, January 21, 2005

Iraq War vet becomes domestic terrorist

Get used to news like this:

The body of Megan Leann Holden, 19, was discovered in a ditch alongside a highway in western Texas. Police said she was killed at the hands of a man who went on a multistate crime spree before he turned up Friday at an Arizona hospital with a gunshot wound.

Johnny Lee Williams, 24, honorably discharged last year after four years as a Marine, was arrested last month in Tyler on a cocaine possession charge. He was released the same day on $2,000 bond.

Police said Williams also was involved in an armed robbery at a convenience store in Texas on Thursday.

And to remarks such as this:

"Something happened to my son," the suspect's mother, Pat Williams, told Dallas television station KDFW, saying he had trouble adjusting to civilian life after serving in Iraq. "Some of the things that he endured I may never know. But it changed who he is and for that I'm sorry."

The true cost of Bush's Iraq-mess has little to do with the pissing dollars odometer:




(After all that's mostly just ugly white-male money being pissed away. And really who gives a damn: Piss baby piss.)


But instead everything to do with something akin to this:


The creation of a whole new generation of psycho American domestic terrorists...

Here comes a new war on brown people!

In a post titled Wonders of Technology, Kevin Drum writes:

Jonah Goldberg thinks I should blog something about George Bush's inaugural speech, but I don't feel like it. I will say this, though: I'll bet him a C-note that six months from now no one will remember a word he said.

Wrong.

OR perhaps more apt: DEAD WRONG.

OR perhaps even yet more apt: DEAD STUPID DUMB LIBERAL WRONG.

Bush's main blather was about "ending tyranny."
You think he was just fanning the flames of war to satisfy his ego?

Kevin, I wouldn't bet your smart liberal ass on it...

His speech is a sure sign he plans on bombing some brown-skinned barefoot children somewhere on this planet.

But we all know it's Iran, don't we?
Always has been Iran.
Always will be Iran.
It's inevitable.

Note today's top two Yahoo stories:



The run up to war with Iran has begun...
I'll bet a C-note that lots of brown Iranian children die.
But hey...they don't count for fuck do they?

Saturday, January 15, 2005

50.73% <---It's legit

There is a two-tiered urban myth in the making:

(1) Bush won 52% of the popular vote.
(2) That somehow 52% is a mandate.

I am not interested in arguing over (2).

I am however interested in pointing out that our culture has calmly accepted the 52%-48% meme.

But it's a red-faced lie.

I invite you to go to Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections and run the numbers yourself.

Here they are:

Bush: 50.73%
Kerry: 48.27%
Other: 1.00%

Of course, the fact that Bush gets rounded up to 52% is entirely in accord with his historic abilty to fail and get promoted.

Indeed, I had a sneaky-sick feeling Bush was going to squeak by in the 2004 election.

Strange as it seems--and totally unscientific as this thinking was--my intuition told me that Bush had so utterly fucked-up the planet, that he couldn't help but get re-selected again. That thought haunted me.

You see there was this persuasive pattern:

Couldn't get a legitimate C or a legitimate college degree.
Couldn't get legitimately assigned to the Air National Guard.
Couldn't serve a legitmate tour of duty.
Couldn't run an oil company.
Couldn't run a baseball team.
Couldn't win a legitimate presidential election.
Couldn't run a country.

And so...

Could get reelected and rounded up to 52%

The question now is what's next for Mr. Bush?
Or, putting it in proper context: How much more does Mr. Bush have to fuck-up the planet to get himself elevated yet again?

Shudder shudder.
Haunt haunt.






Wednesday, January 12, 2005

Ethical cleansing: Then and now...

Now and then we really ought to look at the passing of our culture through a time lens. Specifically where we have been and where we are trending.

Particularly I like hard core examples that show how our values have transformed in our own lifetimes. Because oddly enough a cultural value that most of us regard as earth solid is that moral relativism is necessarily an atrocious thing.

That's a hoot.

Viewed through the lens of time our values have shifted as fluidly as tectonic plates do in geologic time. There is nothing rock solid about us. The cultural ground is quaking beneath our feet--and nothing can be done to stop the upheavels (not even nine ultra conservative Supreme Court judges).

Let me show you one small tremor...



I just finished reading John McPhee's classic account of Bill Bradley at Princeton: A Sense Of Where You Are. I suspect this is the only basketball book that has been in continuous print since 1965. It contains a lot of frozen cultural values layered beneath it's surface. Given what we know about the 60s this paragraph comes up as a core sample chalk-full with meaning:

As a news story once said of Bradley--quite acurately, it seems--he is everything his parents think he is. He approximates what some undergraduates call a straight arrow--a semi-pejorative term for unfortunates who have no talent for vice. Nevertheless, considerable numbers of Princeton undergraduates have told me that Bradley is easily the most widely admired student on the campus and probably the best liked, and that his skill at basketball is not the only way in which he atones for his moral atltitude. He has worked for the Campus Fund Drive, which is a sort of Collegiate Gothic community chest, and for the Orange Key Society, and organization that, among other things, helps freshmen settle down into college life. One effect Bradley has had on Princeton has been to widen noticeably the undergraduate's tolerance for people with high ethical standards. "He is a source of inspiration to anyone who comes in contact with him," one of his classmates says. "You look at yourself and you decide to do better."

Clearly straight-arrowism was squaresville at the time. McPhee paints a vivid picture of Princeton's local scorn for do-good-niks. "Bad" was just starting to become "baaaad." The earth was just beginning to shake.

Now let's flash forward 40 years to the fleshy present.



John C. Yoo is the UC Berkeley Law Professor who has drawn a lot of ink for his legal work on dumbing down the Geneva Conventions--thus allowing the US government to legally torture human prisoners.

He was also in the news recently for defending the rowdy gift-accepting behaviour of Supreme Court Justice Thomas. Having once clerked for Thomas, Yoo perked right up and said:

"I don't see anything wrong in this. I don't see why it is inappropriate to get gifts from friends. "This reflects a bizarre effort to over-ethicize everyday life. If one of these people were to appear before the Supreme Court, Justice Thomas would recuse himself."

My mind keeps running back to Bradley. Do you suppose he was trying to over-ethicise those around him? Or how about Judge Thomas? Do you suppose Clarence "is a source of inspiration to anyone who comes in contact with him"?

Hear's a nifty question for Yoo:

When US citizens look at a Supreme Court Justice are they supposed to feel like students once did when they looked at Bradley?

Or should we change: "You look at yourself and you decide to do better."
Into: "You look at yourself and you decide to grab whatever you can."

Amazing isn't it? In 45 years we've gone from a state of atoning for our goodness to one of not atoning for our wickedness...

What a wild yo-yo ride it's been.






Thursday, January 06, 2005

Hee hee hee...

Fuck you and your Social Security America!



Hee hee hee...

Remember what one of Bush's ex-professors had to say about his values?

"Tsurumi said he particularly recalls Bush’s right-wing extremism at the time, which he said was reflected in off-hand comments equating the New Deal of the 1930s with socialism and the corporation-regulating Securities and Exchange Commission with 'an enemy of capitalism.'"

“I vividly remember that he made a comment saying that people are poor because they’re lazy,” Tsurumi said.

Tsurumi also said Bush displayed a sense of arrogance about his prominent family, including his father, former U.S. President George H.W. Bush.

“[George W. Bush] didn’t stand out as the most promising student, but...he made it sure we understood how well he was connected,” Tsurumi said. “He wasn’t bashful about how he was being pushed upward by Dad’s connections.”


Hee hee hee...

America,
Fuck you and fuck you and fuck you again and again...



Hee hee hee...


Tuesday, January 04, 2005

Trebling the guffaws in Iraq

Just when you thought the doubling of laughter in Iraq had reached its crescendo, and would fall back upon itself by the sheer weight of the tragedy, along comes a paragraph to triple one's reading pleasure.

This from today's NYT's Mideast update:

"But some officials in Washington and in Iraq interpreted the telephone call as a sign that Dr. Allawi, who is clearly concerned his own party could be headed to defeat if the election is held on schedule, may be preparing the ground to make the case for delay to Mr. Bush."

How richly humorous.

Thank God there aren't any Bush officials in the room right now with me. As the wet spray from my redoubled guffaws would sting their faces with mirthful scorn.

Man oh Man... you folks are stupider than stupid.
But thanks all the same for my first belly-laugh of 2005.

Saturday, January 01, 2005

Happy New Year...
(In many a parallel universe)

In a majority of the 6·6·6 dimensional bifurcations of the known universe... educated people everywhere celebrated the arrest yesterday of President Peckerwood.

A picture really is worth a 1000 words.



That's the good news.

The bad news?
The guy is too fucking ugly to catch the eye of any of the galaxy's stud prisoners.